Authors:Thierry KamionkaGuy Lacroix
This working paper investigates whether there is a bias in the measurement of the Self-Sufficiency Project treatment effect because up to 20 per cent of the intended sample did not agree to take part. It does this by comparing the estimated impact of the program that was obtained using only experimental data with the impacts obtained using administrative data on the individuals who did not take part in the experiment.
Published: October 2003
Capability: Experimentation
Policy Area: Income Security - Welfare and Employment
Population: Low-income Populations - Low-skilled Workers - Social Assistance Recipients - Women - Communities and Families - EI Recipients
SRDC is working with Pauktuutit Inuit of Canada to explore the feasibility of basic income in Inuit Nunangat and its potential impacts on Inuit…
Read MoreSince 2020, the Future Skills Centre (FSC) has supported the development, refinement, or expansion of approaches to developing skills for workers from a variety…
Read MoreSkillPlan, BC Construction Industry Skills Improvement Council, in partnership with Canada’s Building Trades Unions (CBTU), Provincial Building Trades Councils (PBTC), U7 SOLUTIONS, British Columbia…
Read More